News analysis, features, special reports about emerging technologies and their impact for innovators and business leaders.
Social Media Supporting teacher CPD - 3
More on Tweeting for Teachers although it's more using it as a launchpad for my own reflections.
National and local policymakers should:
1. publish guidelines and support for teachers and leaders to help them use social
media in schools;
There are various social media strategies out there. The emphasis should be on the potential for teaching and learning. Most guidelines I've seen are about control and read like rules and regulations which put teachers off and fit with the "danger" ethos as its mantra. It's true that to write informed guidelines about potential for the various types of tools but it doesn't have to be detailed just give encouragement and a green light to this area. I drafted some guidelines myself which hopefully will be used by my institution in the future. I share them here for anyone to look at.
2. consider how they will begin to unfilter social media sites for use in schools;
Consider! Just do it. It highlights a contradiction in the way we educate. In formal education it's necessary to control communication - quiet in class, no chatting, pay attention. Social media is extra communication channels. So we control it. The problem is we need to use them for teaching and learning. Banning social media is like banning talking in schools. Sure you have to control inappropriate use but we cut off all that learning potential by banning it.
3. recognise and celebrate self-directed professional learning by teachers using
online tools, and the role of social media in this learning;
Building a culture where this is valued is important. There are lots out there but they are isolated and poorly known in the mainstream.
4. create a common online space where the whole education community can find each other;
This is a bit vague and I have visions of a controlled, unwielding space with poor usability if something is done at a national level. In the case study about Edubuzz, I was hoping for some information about how to do this for myself because it's this kind of purposeful initiative that I could see working for groups of schools.
5. ensure that all Initial Teacher Training courses demonstrate a strong focus on the use of social media tools for ongoing professional development.
Yes, make this law. Can't see this happening any time soon.
Social Media Supporting teacher CPD - 2
This post continues discussing the newly released report Tweeting for teachers. They list 5 recommendations for school leaders and 5 for policy makers. My first thought is how many school leaders will read this? Probably very few unless they have a strategy for promoting it beyond a website. I'll discuss each recommendation which you can read about on p30-33:
1. School leaders should learn about and engage with the social platforms that their teachers, parents and pupils are using every day;
Yes, indeed. The idea that springs into my mind is that what we need to do is get teachers in general using social media for themselves. By using it for themselves ideas will spark about how they can use it in their teaching. Trying to teach using something alien to the rest of their lives isn't easy but this is what we are often asking them to do. Social media are ways of communicating, they are new communication channels. Ways of communicating SHOULD be of interest to us in education.
The logical next step for me is to try and conceive of a training event which caters for this need. This could be a sister session to my 21st century tools for teaching and learning session and would concentrate on how educators can use social media for themselves, in their own learning. This would also fit nicely with the sentiment of this report.
As a bullet point to this recommendation, there is the old chestnut of justifying them using these tools themselves to understand the kids' world. I remember saying this to National Professional Qualification for Headship (NPQH) participants 10 years ago. It's true enough but many argue against it. Practicing what you preach applies and it all comes down to a human beings unwillingness to learn after a certain age. It's incredible how many resist it.
2. School leaders should use a social media tool as part of their communications with the school
community;
This would be a good way of establishing it's validity. The problem is that the only relationship much of social media has with formal education is to be banned, it's associated with negative things.
You have to stick your head above the paraphet to alter this.
3. validate and support their staff in using social media tools for ongoing professional development;
This is a positive strategic move which also give the mode validity for learning. This could start with one tool that some people have good experiences and understanding of within the school or institution.
4. turn online activity into offline actions, in order to harness the benefits of face-to-face interaction alongside those of online interaction;
This is about using technology within the classroom. Tablets will impact on this in the future. However, this is whole new area in itself. In the classroom or for homework there is scope for both but shouldn't be blurred together as both need carefully planned learning design.
5. implement robust systems for evaluating the impact of CPD on teacher effectiveness and student outcomes
No comment on this one.
The next post will consider the recommendations for policy makers.
1. School leaders should learn about and engage with the social platforms that their teachers, parents and pupils are using every day;
Yes, indeed. The idea that springs into my mind is that what we need to do is get teachers in general using social media for themselves. By using it for themselves ideas will spark about how they can use it in their teaching. Trying to teach using something alien to the rest of their lives isn't easy but this is what we are often asking them to do. Social media are ways of communicating, they are new communication channels. Ways of communicating SHOULD be of interest to us in education.
The logical next step for me is to try and conceive of a training event which caters for this need. This could be a sister session to my 21st century tools for teaching and learning session and would concentrate on how educators can use social media for themselves, in their own learning. This would also fit nicely with the sentiment of this report.
As a bullet point to this recommendation, there is the old chestnut of justifying them using these tools themselves to understand the kids' world. I remember saying this to National Professional Qualification for Headship (NPQH) participants 10 years ago. It's true enough but many argue against it. Practicing what you preach applies and it all comes down to a human beings unwillingness to learn after a certain age. It's incredible how many resist it.
2. School leaders should use a social media tool as part of their communications with the school
community;
This would be a good way of establishing it's validity. The problem is that the only relationship much of social media has with formal education is to be banned, it's associated with negative things.
You have to stick your head above the paraphet to alter this.
3. validate and support their staff in using social media tools for ongoing professional development;
This is a positive strategic move which also give the mode validity for learning. This could start with one tool that some people have good experiences and understanding of within the school or institution.
4. turn online activity into offline actions, in order to harness the benefits of face-to-face interaction alongside those of online interaction;
This is about using technology within the classroom. Tablets will impact on this in the future. However, this is whole new area in itself. In the classroom or for homework there is scope for both but shouldn't be blurred together as both need carefully planned learning design.
5. implement robust systems for evaluating the impact of CPD on teacher effectiveness and student outcomes
No comment on this one.
The next post will consider the recommendations for policy makers.
Social media supporting teachers CPD
A fews days ago I went to an interesting event promoting a new report published by the Pearson Centre for Policy and Learning here in London. It is called: Tweeting for teachers; how can social media support teacher professional development? I'm going to use it to reflect on the social media and education.
I'm going to give detailed analysis of the parts that interested me to help me reflect and articulate my thinking.
Overall, it's a useful and worthwhile read but it promises more than it delivers. The overall message is noble and it could act as a inspirational call-to-arms for educators to start investigating social media. I saw some of this at the event and I hope the message can reach out there. The recommendations are sounds although a little obvious. There are also some interesting case studies about initiatives I wasn't aware of. There is a deliberate link to teachers' CPD which is good and the review of research is interesting. However, there's a distinct lack of 'how to'. More on this later.
Firstly, the event I attended was well organised and free. Their #tweetingforteachers worked well as they had dedicated people looking after it. I ended up participating quite a lot as things occurred to me. The usefulness of micro-blogging to facilitate communicate in events cannot be disputed. It's a pity they didn't have the stream setup on the screen but there was a fair bit of interaction. It helped that I got a good 3G connection. Interestingly, most delegates didn't participate in this showing how far we have to go.
Next, the title - tweeting for teachers. I don't like this. It's catchy yes but it's a marketing phrase which is misleading as the overall scope of the report is social media. It's true that lots of the examples were about twitter but if the report wants to be about social media in general then it's not an appropriate title. Tweeting for teacher is a great title if you were to extrapolate the bits about twitter and add practical guidance on the processes involved in twitter.
Overall, it's a report that can only scratch the surface of this subject. Social media is a huge, huge area. In a 36 page report it's not going to happen. Also, the contexts with which it can be used a numerous. The case studies consist of 3 people that blog and tweet for their own learning, a local authority blogging facility that worked well, a video competition, #ukedchat and Teachmeet. Of these, #ukedchat and Teachmeet are the most inspirational. They are both established synchronous events which can be engaged in. The others are interesting but they would benefit from guidance on how to act if you're inspired to setup something similar. Also, where are the dynamic image creation and sharing tools, the video creation, use of audio, mindmapping tools, social bookmarking, multimedia posters, social networking/group sites etc. I worry about teachers will read this report and think that the case studies cover everything that's possible.
Finally for this post - categorisation. with some about self-directed learning and personal learning networks and others about sharing, reflective learning and still others about synchronous event, the report is crying out for careful categorisation so that content is made "meaningful to teachers and manageable within the context of teaching practice."(p20 of this report).
This is the massive gap we have in education with learning technologies. We have to make things easier for our teachers and academics. We need to show them how and in their context. Something like http://www.teachertrainingvideos.com/ and http://www.freetech4teachers.com/ are more useful in this regard. There is a wealth of policy advice and a wealth of how to use tools advice but it's the middle ground of putting it in our context which is lacking. I believe that largely teachers can do this for themselves but only if we promote and facilitate it.
In my next post, I'll reflect on the key recommendations from this report.
I'm going to give detailed analysis of the parts that interested me to help me reflect and articulate my thinking.
Overall, it's a useful and worthwhile read but it promises more than it delivers. The overall message is noble and it could act as a inspirational call-to-arms for educators to start investigating social media. I saw some of this at the event and I hope the message can reach out there. The recommendations are sounds although a little obvious. There are also some interesting case studies about initiatives I wasn't aware of. There is a deliberate link to teachers' CPD which is good and the review of research is interesting. However, there's a distinct lack of 'how to'. More on this later.
Firstly, the event I attended was well organised and free. Their #tweetingforteachers worked well as they had dedicated people looking after it. I ended up participating quite a lot as things occurred to me. The usefulness of micro-blogging to facilitate communicate in events cannot be disputed. It's a pity they didn't have the stream setup on the screen but there was a fair bit of interaction. It helped that I got a good 3G connection. Interestingly, most delegates didn't participate in this showing how far we have to go.
Next, the title - tweeting for teachers. I don't like this. It's catchy yes but it's a marketing phrase which is misleading as the overall scope of the report is social media. It's true that lots of the examples were about twitter but if the report wants to be about social media in general then it's not an appropriate title. Tweeting for teacher is a great title if you were to extrapolate the bits about twitter and add practical guidance on the processes involved in twitter.
Overall, it's a report that can only scratch the surface of this subject. Social media is a huge, huge area. In a 36 page report it's not going to happen. Also, the contexts with which it can be used a numerous. The case studies consist of 3 people that blog and tweet for their own learning, a local authority blogging facility that worked well, a video competition, #ukedchat and Teachmeet. Of these, #ukedchat and Teachmeet are the most inspirational. They are both established synchronous events which can be engaged in. The others are interesting but they would benefit from guidance on how to act if you're inspired to setup something similar. Also, where are the dynamic image creation and sharing tools, the video creation, use of audio, mindmapping tools, social bookmarking, multimedia posters, social networking/group sites etc. I worry about teachers will read this report and think that the case studies cover everything that's possible.
Finally for this post - categorisation. with some about self-directed learning and personal learning networks and others about sharing, reflective learning and still others about synchronous event, the report is crying out for careful categorisation so that content is made "meaningful to teachers and manageable within the context of teaching practice."(p20 of this report).
This is the massive gap we have in education with learning technologies. We have to make things easier for our teachers and academics. We need to show them how and in their context. Something like http://www.teachertrainingvideos.com/ and http://www.freetech4teachers.com/ are more useful in this regard. There is a wealth of policy advice and a wealth of how to use tools advice but it's the middle ground of putting it in our context which is lacking. I believe that largely teachers can do this for themselves but only if we promote and facilitate it.
In my next post, I'll reflect on the key recommendations from this report.
Externalisation of pedagogic principles
“The first step in redesign often entailed the externalisation of pedagogic principles which had previously been tacit."
This quote is from report on the PREEL (From Pedagogical Research to Embedded E-learning) project which ran at the Institute of Education a few years ago. It was one of those initiative which tried to help educators with their e-learning design. Interestingly, there were deliberate attempts to link research and practice through the promotion and incorporation of IOE's own e-learning research output. This post and the above quote is about educator knowledge of their own pedagogy, the way they teach.
The quote promotes the tactic of asking educators to verbalise how they are teaching a particular course. In articulating this out loud it helps clarify for themselves how they teach. We are not talking learning theory here just how they do things. For some how a session is structured and taught may have evolved over the years. A particular educator may have a natural default pedagogical stance and the reasons why are not clear even to themselves.
I've talked in the past about how some educators don't have an understanding of their own pedagogy stance or indeed an understanding of pedagogical theory in general. I've speculated that this hinders moves to talk about internet-based communication/collaboration tools in terms of pedagogical affordance. The above tactic is instructive because it suggests that this doesn't really matter as the knowledge is there albeit latent and not externalised. It's your job (as a learning technologist) to bring this out of them. They know how they teach and why they do it. And you don't need to be judgmentally about this, you just need to listen and teach them how, and to what end, they could use what's available. What this also says is that it's not about lack of understanding, it's about lack of time and sometimes about lack of learning design. For the former, an educator doesn't have the time to think about their learning design. They are too busy. For the latter, they can't be bothered. This is rare but there's good and bad in every profession.
This quote is from report on the PREEL (From Pedagogical Research to Embedded E-learning) project which ran at the Institute of Education a few years ago. It was one of those initiative which tried to help educators with their e-learning design. Interestingly, there were deliberate attempts to link research and practice through the promotion and incorporation of IOE's own e-learning research output. This post and the above quote is about educator knowledge of their own pedagogy, the way they teach.
The quote promotes the tactic of asking educators to verbalise how they are teaching a particular course. In articulating this out loud it helps clarify for themselves how they teach. We are not talking learning theory here just how they do things. For some how a session is structured and taught may have evolved over the years. A particular educator may have a natural default pedagogical stance and the reasons why are not clear even to themselves.
I've talked in the past about how some educators don't have an understanding of their own pedagogy stance or indeed an understanding of pedagogical theory in general. I've speculated that this hinders moves to talk about internet-based communication/collaboration tools in terms of pedagogical affordance. The above tactic is instructive because it suggests that this doesn't really matter as the knowledge is there albeit latent and not externalised. It's your job (as a learning technologist) to bring this out of them. They know how they teach and why they do it. And you don't need to be judgmentally about this, you just need to listen and teach them how, and to what end, they could use what's available. What this also says is that it's not about lack of understanding, it's about lack of time and sometimes about lack of learning design. For the former, an educator doesn't have the time to think about their learning design. They are too busy. For the latter, they can't be bothered. This is rare but there's good and bad in every profession.
Asynchronous = Time and space learning
A common topic of conversation amongst educators when discussing learning technologies is the time and space they need to find out about the various tools in the VLE and redesign their courses. It is no secret that in my context of HE time and space is sadly lacking. What they are saying is that they need time and space to learn. Online, many of the standard communication/collaboration tools available to educators are best used asynchronously. Asynchronous learning activities are time and space learning activities. Well designed courses using such tools to scaffold students' learning through a series of activities which give them time for reflection, time for critical thinking, time for articulation and clarification. The communication can, therefore, be more meaningful and of a better quality all round. Within the sessions, within any synchronous learning event, the quality of any dialogue is compromised by the immediacy of the responses. There can be little time for reflection in such an environment. Some cope better than others with this but overall it's just not as good. I should put potentially at the end of this of course as other factor impact on the learning. But, in essence, the potential for critical thinking and deep learning is better within asynchronous learning activities because...
Asynchronous = time and space learning.
Asynchronous = time and space learning.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)